mws.gms : Computation of Horowitz’s work-trip mode choice model estimates
For a sample of 842 persons in Washington DC in the late 1960’s Horowitz
modeled the 'work-trip mode choice' decision (automobile or other) for the
daily trip from home to work.
We compute the max (weighted) score estimators using a MIP formulation due to
Florios and Skouras.
References:
- Florios, K, and Skouras, S, A note on exact computation of max weighted score estimators by mixed integer programming. Tech. rep., National Technical University of Athens and Athens University of Economics and Business, 2007.
- Horowitz, J L, Semiparametric estimation of a work-trip mode choice model. Journal of Econometrics 58, 1-2 (1993), 49-70.
Large Model of Type: MIP Includes: worktrip.inc
$Title Computation of Horowitz’s work-trip mode choice model estimates (MWS,SEQ=331)
$ontext
For a sample of 842 persons in Washington DC in the late 1960’s Horowitz
modeled the 'work-trip mode choice' decision (automobile or other) for the
daily trip from home to work.
We compute the max (weighted) score estimators using a MIP formulation due to
Florios and Skouras.
Florios, K, and Skouras, S, A note on exact computation of max weighted score
estimators by mixed integer programming. Tech. rep., National Technical
University of Athens & Athens University of Economics and Business, 2007
Horowitz, J L, Semiparametric estimation of a work-trip mode choice model.
Journal of Econometrics 58(1-2), 49-70, 1993
$offtext
Sets
p explanatory variables /
DCOST "transit fare minus automobile travel cost"
CARS "cars owned by the traveler’s household"
DOVTT "transit out-of-vehicle minus automobile out-of-vehicle time"
DIVTT "transit in-vehicle minus automobile in-vehicle time"
INTCPT "intercept" /
T sample size (households) / 1*842 /;
Parameter
y(T) value of binary dependent variable
Table X(T,*) explanatory and dependent variables
$offlisting
$include worktrip.inc
$onlisting
;
y(T) = X(T,'DEPEND');
$if not set normalize_X $set normalize_X 1
Parameters
delta domain for every parameter to be estimated / 10 /
Xnms(T,p) 'Matrix X, normalized all variances equal to 1 if %normalizeX%==1'
mean(p) average of X(T.p) over T for mu sigma normalization
stdev(p) stdev of X(T.p) over T etc
omega(T) tight valid big M coefficient for disjunctive constraints;
mean(p) = sum(T, X(T,p))/card(T);
stdev(p) = sqrt(sum(T, sqr(X(T,p)-mean(p)))/(card(T)-1));
Xnms(T,p) = X(T,p);
$if %normalize_X% == 1 Xnms(T,p) = 1; Xnms(T,p)$stdev(p) = (X(T,p)-mean(p))/stdev(p);
omega(T) = sum(p$(ord(p)=1), abs(Xnms(T,p))) + delta*sum(p$(ord(p)>1), abs(Xnms(T,p)));
Variables
z(T) indicates if sign coincidence for y and linear comb. of X
beta(p) vector components to estimate in max weighted score
mws objective variable;
Binary Variable z;
Equations
objfun objective function is (weighted) number of sign coincidences
cosg(T) sign coincidence constraint between y and X*b;
objfun.. mws =e= sum(T, z(T)) ;
cosg(T).. (1-2*y(T))*sum(p, beta(p)*Xnms(T,p)) =l= omega(T)*(1-z(T));
Model MaxWeightedScore/all/ ;
beta.lo(p) = -delta; beta.up(p) = delta;
beta.fx(p)$(ord(p)=1) = 1;
option optcr=0;
Solve MaxWeightedScore using mip max mws;
Parameter
ffbeta(p) parameter vector components;
ffbeta(p) = beta.l(p);
$if not %normalize_X% == 1 $goto display
Parameter
fbeta(p) intermediate vector;
alias (p,pp);
fbeta(p) = -sum(pp$stdev(pp), beta.l(pp)*mean(pp)/stdev(pp)) + beta.l(p);
fbeta(p)$stdev(p) = beta.l(p)/stdev(p);
ffbeta(p) = fbeta(p)/sum(pp$(ord(pp)=1), fbeta(pp));
$label display
display beta.l, ffbeta;